Match statistics snapshot
- Wycombe created the clearer chances on xG (1.74 vs 1.04, Δ 0.70).
- Lincoln fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Wycombe was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 1.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 282 | Accurate passes | 371Lead |
| 380 | Total passes | 470Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.