Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 13%).
- Wycombe held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 63%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 250Lead | Accurate passes | 198 |
| 395Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |