Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Wycombe held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 376Lead | Accurate passes | 299 |
| 445Lead | Total passes | 377 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |