Match statistics snapshot
- Amed fired more attempts (13 vs 3 shots).
- Yeni Malatyaspor was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 54%).
- Amed held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Yeni Malatyaspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Yeni Malatyaspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 322 | Accurate passes | 573Lead |
| 394 | Total passes | 640Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Yeni Malatyaspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Yeni Malatyaspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Yeni Malatyaspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |