Match statistics snapshot
- Yokohama FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.68 vs 0.47, Δ 0.21).
- Shimizu S-pulse fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Yokohama FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Yokohama Fc | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 0.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Yokohama Fc | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 208 | Accurate passes | 511Lead |
| 303 | Total passes | 630Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Yokohama Fc | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Yokohama Fc | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Yokohama Fc | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |