Match statistics snapshot
- Ypiranga-RS created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 0.61, Δ 0.55).
- Ypiranga-RS fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Ferroviario was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ypiranga-rs | Statistic | Ferroviario |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ypiranga-rs | Statistic | Ferroviario |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 327Lead | Accurate passes | 316 |
| 388 | Total passes | 405Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ypiranga-rs | Statistic | Ferroviario |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Corner kicks | 9 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ypiranga-rs | Statistic | Ferroviario |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ypiranga-rs | Statistic | Ferroviario |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |