Match statistics snapshot
- Zalaegerszegi TE fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Zalaegerszegi TE was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 31%).
- Kecskeméti TE held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 255 | Accurate passes | 500Lead |
| 321 | Total passes | 569Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |