Match statistics snapshot
- Zalaegerszegi TE fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Zalaegerszegi TE was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 46%).
- Kecskeméti TE held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 249 | Accurate passes | 540Lead |
| 328 | Total passes | 614Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Kecskeméti Te |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |