Match statistics snapshot
- Paks fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Zalaegerszegi TE was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 25%).
- Paks held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 402Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 505Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.