Match statistics snapshot
- Zalaegerszegi TE was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 31%).
- Paks held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 252 | Accurate passes | 393Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 498Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Paks |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |