Match statistics snapshot
- Puskas Academy fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Puskas Academy held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 512Lead |
| 371 | Total passes | 617Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zalaegerszegi Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |