Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Zamalek SC was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 30%).
- Zamalek SC held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 487Lead | Accurate passes | 277 |
| 578Lead | Total passes | 367 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |