Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.55 vs 0.99, Δ 0.56).
- Ceramica Cleopatra fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Ceramica Cleopatra was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 1.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 23% | Ball possession | 77%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 109 | Accurate passes | 540Lead |
| 180 | Total passes | 615Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.37 | Goals prevented | -0.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.