Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi fired more attempts (22 vs 12 shots).
- Zamalek SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
- Zamalek SC held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 410Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.