Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.87, Δ 0.60).
- Zamalek SC fired more attempts (21 vs 8 shots).
- Zamalek SC held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 307Lead | Accurate passes | 171 |
| 380Lead | Total passes | 250 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 0.68 | Goals prevented | 0.68 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.