Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Zamalek SC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 22%).
- Zamalek SC held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 436Lead | Accurate passes | 209 |
| 532Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.