Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 33%).
- Zamalek SC held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Masr |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Masr |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 555Lead | Accurate passes | 159 |
| 634Lead | Total passes | 247 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Masr |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Masr |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Masr |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.