Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Pharco was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 29%).
- Zamalek SC held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 454Lead | Accurate passes | 234 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 297 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zamalek Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.