Zaragoza vs Las Palmas Match Statistics & xG

Zaragoza vs Las Palmas Match Statistics & xG | Sportra

Zaragoza vs Las Palmas match statistics

xG, possession, shots, and full match statistics for Zaragoza vs Las Palmas in Segunda División.

Match statistics snapshot

Home created the clearer chances on xG (1.75 vs 1.05, Δ 0.70).
Away fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
Away was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 22%).

ZaragozavsLas Palmas

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
1.75Lead	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.	1.05

3Lead	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	5
8	Shots inside the box	8

6Lead	Shots off target	5
2	Shots on target	5Lead

1	Shots outside the box	4Lead
9	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	12Lead

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
47%	Ball possession	53%Lead
72%	Pass accuracy	80%Lead
284	Accurate passes	363Lead
393	Total passes	451Lead

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
1	Corner kicks	3Lead

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
1	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	2Lead
3Lead	Goalkeeper saves	1
	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
20	Fouls	18Lead
	Red cards
3	Yellow cards	2Lead

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

Home leads this block

2Home

duels won

1Away

Away leads shot accuracy (+88% vs Home)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home22%35% share
Away42%65% share
Away leads shot accuracy (+88% vs Home)
2
xG per shot
Average danger per attempt. Higher means better chances, not just more shots.
Home0.19469% share
Away0.08831% share
Home leads shot quality (+122% vs Away)
3
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home89%57% share
Away67%43% share
Home leads box penetration (+33% vs Away)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Home leads possession efficiency (+88% vs Away)

1
xG per possession %
Chance creation per share of the ball — separates sterile possession from threat.
Home0.03765% share
Away0.02035% share
Home leads possession efficiency (+88% vs Away)
2
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home4454% share
Away3846% share
Home — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Away leads this block

0Home

duels won

1Away

Away leads territorial pressure (+30% vs Home)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home2043% share
Away2657% share
Away leads territorial pressure (+30% vs Home)

Defensive

How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Home — stronger shot quality allowed

1
xGA per shot conceded
Quality of chances allowed per opponent shot — lower means a compact, limiting defence.
Home0.08831% share
Away0.19469% share
Home — stronger shot quality allowed
2
Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)
xG faced divided by saves made — higher means the keeper faced tougher stops.
Home0.3517% share
Away1.7583% share
Away leads keeper workload (+400% vs Home)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

Home leads this block

4Home

duels won

2Away

Home had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home26.054% share
Away22.046% share
Home leads (26.0 vs 22.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home33.844% share
Away42.456% share
Away leads (42.4 vs 33.8).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home9.045% share
Away11.055% share
Away leads (11.0 vs 9.0).
4
Clinical index (xG/shot)
xG per shot — finishing threat independent of volume.
Home0.19469% share
Away0.08831% share
Home leads (0.194 vs 0.088).
5
Defensive compactness
Inverse of xGA per shot faced — higher means opponents got worse chances.
Home91.353% share
Away80.647% share
Home leads (91.3 vs 80.6).
6
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home24.052% share
Away22.048% share
Home leads (24.0 vs 22.0).

ZaragozavsLas Palmas

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
1.75Lead	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.	1.05

3Lead	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	5
8	Shots inside the box	8

6Lead	Shots off target	5
2	Shots on target	5Lead

1	Shots outside the box	4Lead
9	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	12Lead

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
47%	Ball possession	53%Lead
72%	Pass accuracy	80%Lead
284	Accurate passes	363Lead
393	Total passes	451Lead

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
1	Corner kicks	3Lead

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
1	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	2Lead
3Lead	Goalkeeper saves	1
	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
20	Fouls	18Lead
	Red cards
3	Yellow cards	2Lead

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

Home leads this block

2Home

duels won

1Away

Away leads shot accuracy (+88% vs Home)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home22%35% share
Away42%65% share
Away leads shot accuracy (+88% vs Home)
2
xG per shot
Average danger per attempt. Higher means better chances, not just more shots.
Home0.19469% share
Away0.08831% share
Home leads shot quality (+122% vs Away)
3
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home89%57% share
Away67%43% share
Home leads box penetration (+33% vs Away)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Home leads possession efficiency (+88% vs Away)

1
xG per possession %
Chance creation per share of the ball — separates sterile possession from threat.
Home0.03765% share
Away0.02035% share
Home leads possession efficiency (+88% vs Away)
2
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home4454% share
Away3846% share
Home — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Away leads this block

0Home

duels won

1Away

Away leads territorial pressure (+30% vs Home)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home2043% share
Away2657% share
Away leads territorial pressure (+30% vs Home)

Defensive

How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Home — stronger shot quality allowed

1
xGA per shot conceded
Quality of chances allowed per opponent shot — lower means a compact, limiting defence.
Home0.08831% share
Away0.19469% share
Home — stronger shot quality allowed
2
Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)
xG faced divided by saves made — higher means the keeper faced tougher stops.
Home0.3517% share
Away1.7583% share
Away leads keeper workload (+400% vs Home)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

Home leads this block

4Home

duels won

2Away

Home had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home26.054% share
Away22.046% share
Home leads (26.0 vs 22.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home33.844% share
Away42.456% share
Away leads (42.4 vs 33.8).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home9.045% share
Away11.055% share
Away leads (11.0 vs 9.0).
4
Clinical index (xG/shot)
xG per shot — finishing threat independent of volume.
Home0.19469% share
Away0.08831% share
Home leads (0.194 vs 0.088).
5
Defensive compactness
Inverse of xGA per shot faced — higher means opponents got worse chances.
Home91.353% share
Away80.647% share
Home leads (91.3 vs 80.6).
6
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home24.052% share
Away22.048% share
Home leads (24.0 vs 22.0).

Zaragoza vs Las Palmas Match Statistics & xG

Zaragoza vs Las Palmas match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Zaragoza vs Las Palmas match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Shot accuracy

xG per shot

Inside box ratio

xG per possession %

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

xGA per shot conceded

Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Clinical index (xG/shot)

Defensive compactness

Chaos factor

Shot accuracy

xG per shot

Inside box ratio

xG per possession %

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

xGA per shot conceded

Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Clinical index (xG/shot)

Defensive compactness

Chaos factor