Match statistics snapshot
- Cukaricki fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Železničar Pančevo was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 18%).
- Železničar Pančevo held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Železničar Pančevo | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Železničar Pančevo | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 360Lead | Accurate passes | 270 |
| 445Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Železničar Pančevo | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Železničar Pančevo | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Železničar Pančevo | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.