Match statistics snapshot
- Zemun created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 0.44, Δ 0.13).
- Zemun fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Zemun was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 14%).
Zemun vs Macva
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zemun | Statistic | Macva |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zemun | Statistic | Macva |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 202 | Accurate passes | 329Lead |
| 295 | Total passes | 416Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zemun | Statistic | Macva |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zemun | Statistic | Macva |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zemun | Statistic | Macva |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 19Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Other
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Zemun | Statistic | Macva |
|---|---|---|
| 19Lead | Free Kicks | 18 |