Match statistics snapshot
- Žilina fired more attempts (20 vs 3 shots).
- FK Košice was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 45%).
- Žilina held more of the ball (75% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Žilina | Statistic | Fk Košice |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
| OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | ||
| Shots inside the box | ||
8Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
| Shots outside the box | ||
20Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 3 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Žilina | Statistic | Fk Košice |
|---|---|---|
75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Žilina | Statistic | Fk Košice |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Žilina | Statistic | Fk Košice |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | ||
2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Žilina | Statistic | Fk Košice |
|---|---|---|
9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Fk Košice leads this block
Fk Košice leads shot accuracy (+48% vs Žilina)
Fk Košice leads shot accuracy (+48% vs Žilina)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Fk Košice leads this block
Fk Košice had the edge in 2 of 3 signals in this block.
Fk Košice leads (19.0 vs 13.0).
Žilina leads (5.0 vs 4.0).
Fk Košice leads (14.0 vs 11.0).