Match statistics snapshot
- Žilina fired more attempts (23 vs 4 shots).
- Spartak Trnava was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 39%).
- Žilina held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Žilina | Statistic | Spartak Trnava |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
| OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | ||
14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
9Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
9Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
23Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 4 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Žilina | Statistic | Spartak Trnava |
|---|---|---|
60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
411Lead | Accurate passes | 230 |
488Lead | Total passes | 322 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Žilina | Statistic | Spartak Trnava |
|---|---|---|
7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Žilina | Statistic | Spartak Trnava |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 1 |
1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Žilina | Statistic | Spartak Trnava |
|---|---|---|
9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Spartak Trnava leads this block
Spartak Trnava leads shot accuracy (+28% vs Žilina)
Spartak Trnava leads shot accuracy (+28% vs Žilina)
Spartak Trnava leads box penetration (+64% vs Žilina)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Žilina leads this block
Spartak Trnava — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Spartak Trnava — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Žilina leads this block
Žilina leads territorial pressure (+250% vs Spartak Trnava)
Žilina leads territorial pressure (+250% vs Spartak Trnava)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Žilina leads this block
Žilina had the edge in 4 of 4 signals in this block.
Žilina leads (15.0 vs 13.0).
Žilina leads (50.4 vs 28.4).
Žilina leads (21.0 vs 7.0).
Žilina leads (17.0 vs 13.0).