Match statistics snapshot
- Zlin created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 1.01, Δ 0.55).
- Plzen fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Zlin was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zlin | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zlin | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 27% | Ball possession | 73%Lead |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 112 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 201 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zlin | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zlin | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.08 | Goals prevented | -1.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zlin | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.