Match statistics snapshot
- Teplice created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 2.83, Δ 1.74).
- Teplice fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Teplice was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Zlin | Statistic | Teplice |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.83Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Zlin | Statistic | Teplice |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 306Lead | Accurate passes | 265 |
| 384Lead | Total passes | 355 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Zlin | Statistic | Teplice |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Zlin | Statistic | Teplice |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.56 | Goals prevented | -0.56 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Zlin | Statistic | Teplice |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.