Goal efficiency
How clinical and direct the player was in front of goal — volume, accuracy, and conversion.
Schwaben Augsburg · Regionalliga - Relegation Round · Goalkeeper · #1 · Germany · 23 yrs
P. Sander plays as a goalkeeper for Schwaben Augsburg. P. Sander is a German international, 23 years old, goalkeeper, currently at Schwaben Augsburg. P. Sander wears shirt number 1 for Schwaben Augsburg. P. Sander was born in Germany on 2003-01-06. P. Sander's Sportra profile tracks season statistics across Regionalliga - Relegation Round, U19 Bundesliga, Regionalliga - Nord, Regionalliga - Relegation Round. P. Sander's page brings together career clubs, trophies, injury history, multi-competition stats, and related news headlines. On Sportra you can explore P. Sander season statistics, transfer history, trophies, injury updates, and related news across every competition tracked in the profile.
Season intelligence
Profile as Goalkeeper: high usage. Archetype: Modern goalkeeper.
Scaled 0–99 from season output — map to fantasy, comparisons, or scouting cards.
Per-90 rates, efficiency ratios, and Sportra indices from season totals.
How clinical and direct the player was in front of goal — volume, accuracy, and conversion.
Playmaking output: assists, key passes, and custom chance-creation signals.
Minutes, availability, and how central they were to the team.
Every tracked category for this league and season, grouped by Sportra.
In a recent report, Fichajes revealed that Manchester United have set their sights on Fulham midfielder Sander Berge. It has been mentioned that the Red Devils have identified the Norwegian midfielder...
What began as a plan designed to reshape the governing body's financial future has rapidly evolved into a crisis that could alter the landscape of international soccer for years to come. Gianni Infantino is facing one of the biggest challenges of his presidency after FIFA’s controversial commercial proposal ignited an extraordinary reaction across European soccer. What began as a plan designed to reshape the governing body’s financial future has rapidly evolved into a crisis that could alter the landscape of international soccer for years to come. The proposal has triggered widespread criticism from governing bodies, leagues, player representatives and politicians, with many arguing that soccer’s most prestigious tournament should remain protected from outside commercial ownership. While FIFA insists the initiative is designed to strengthen the global game, opposition continues to grow as more details emerge. Earlier this week, FIFA unveiled plans to establish a new commercial entity known as FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), which would oversee the organization’s major competitions, including the World Cup. Under the proposal, FIFA would retain majority ownership while selling up to 20% of the company to private investors, with the venture reportedly valued at $20 billion. The governing body hopes to raise approximately $4.2 billion, arguing that the additional funding would be redistributed among its 211 member associations to improve soccer development worldwide. According to FIFA, every association would receive significantly increased financial support if the proposal is approved before the September deadline. The FIFA World Cup Winner’s Trophy Infantino defended the initiative, insisting it remains optional rather than compulsory for member associations. “It’s part of a democratic process — a consultation process — and, above all, it is an opportunity but not an obligation,” Infantino said. He also described the proposal as “a golden opportunity to turbocharge the development of the game globally.” UEFA’s historic decision revealed The mystery surrounding Europe’s response ended on Thursday following an emergency virtual meeting involving all 55 UEFA member associations. Every single UEFA member voted unanimously to support a boycott of FIFA competitions, including future men’s and women’s World Cups, if FIFA proceeds with selling ownership stakes in its tournaments to private investors. The unprecedented decision represents one of the strongest collective actions ever taken against FIFA by a continental confederation. Following the meeting, UEFA released a lengthy statement explaining why it believes the proposal threatens the future governance of soccer. “The World Cup cannot be treated as an investment product. It is one of soccer’s greatest sporting legacies… No part of it should ever be surrendered to private investors. The World Cup is not for sale.” Statement on behalf of UEFA and its 55 National Associations— UEFA (@UEFA) July 30, 2026 UEFA also confirmed the consequences if FIFA refuses to abandon the project. “No UEFA national team will participate in any FIFA competition for so long as these proposals remain alive, unless this proposal has been abandoned in its entirety.” Europe warns soccer cannot become an investment asset UEFA’s criticism went well beyond procedural concerns, arguing that allowing outside investors into FIFA competitions would permanently change how soccer is governed. According to the European governing body, investor involvement would place commercial expectations ahead of sporting priorities, influencing everything from tournament formats to scheduling decisions. FIFA President, Gianni Infantino in conversation with UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin “The moment external investors acquire ownership interests in FIFA competitions, soccer changes forever,” UEFA wrote. The organization added that “football’s future cannot be dictated by the expectations of those whose first duty is to maximise
After reports revealed the idea of FIFA and Gianni Infantino to sell World Cup stakes to private capitals, UEFA delivered a scathing response: "None of us are the owners of football." The global soccer landscape suffered a massive shockwave following reports that FIFA president Gianni Infantino plans to sell commercial stakes in the World Cup to private investors. The proposal drew immediate, fierce backlash from rival governing bodies, with European confederation UEFA issuing a blistering response: “None of us are the owners of football.” According to an initial report by The Times‘ Martyn Ziegler, FIFA plans to sell minority equity stakes tied to World Cup commercial rights to private investors. The deal would center on establishing a new commercial subsidiary responsible for managing business and event operations across top men’s and women’s competitions. Hours after the news broke, FIFA confirmed the project, claiming the objective is to expand global soccer development funding to over $10 billion. As part of the pitch, FIFA offered a sweetened incentive for its 211 Member Associations, providing access to up to $20 million in immediate, one-off capital funding for special projects under the newly established FIFA Fast Forward Program (FFFP). To execute the plan, soccer’s global governing body created FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), a controlled subsidiary designed to handle commercial and operational delivery. FIFA insisted it will retain full operational authority over FFE, assuring member nations that outside money will not influence “football governance, competitions, match calendar, and all regulatory and sporting decisions.“ UEFA statement on The Times article: ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/ye1tjfWRCb— UEFA (@UEFA) July 28, 2026 UEFA strongly opposes FIFA’s commercial push As soon as reports surfaced, UEFA, European soccer’s governing body and Infantino’s primary political opposition, came out in full defiance. Coming off lingering friction surrounding the execution and politics of the 2026 World Cup, the news provoked immediate outrage across the European confederation. UEFA released an official statement slamming the proposal, delivering an uncompromising message to FIFA: “This crosses a line that football’s governing institutions should never cross. UEFA takes it extremely seriously. So should every National Football Association. So should every stakeholder: leagues, clubs, players, supporters, governments and everyone who cares about the future of the game.“ The Aleksander Ceferin-led organization concluded by warning against the dangers of privatizing the sport for short-term corporate capital. “The soul and governance of football are not assets to trade – especially with zero transparency as to who gains financially. None of us are the owners of football. It is not FIFA’s to sell,” the statement concluded. FIFA defends its independence and governance As reported by sports journalist Ben Jacobs, FIFA aims to raise up to $4.2 billion in capital and has already approached Josh Kushner’s Thrive Capital as well as American investment banking titan J.P. Morgan as key anchor partners. While any final proposal requires formal approval from the 211 Member Associations during a consultation phase, FIFA maintains that its institutional independence remains intact. In its statement addressing the external investment strategy, FIFA sought to downplay concerns over corporate influence. “The FIFA President and the FIFA administration have a duty to control the development of this project. Outside investors will have only a minority stake in FFE and will not play any operational role. Equally, they are investing in a subsidiary of FIFA, and not in FIFA itself. For FIFA, nothing changes,” the organization stated.
Tap a headline to view metadata and excerpt fields in Sportra, then use the article website button to continue on the original publisher page.