‘The post-Kane era isn’t really one I want to contemplate!’ – your world cup questions answered
Football report Nick Ames answered your questions about Kane’s captaincy, Tuchel’s future, and England’s team psychology ohfffs asks: How many good performances did England manage in this World Cup? There was a really good half against Croatia and a good start against Mexico, but most of the rest was pretty poor. They were limp against Panama, dreadful against Ghana, just about hung on against Mexico and were very lucky to get past Norway. We know England can qualify but looked at objectively England were pretty underwhelming throughout.Nick says:“Good” is subjective but let’s say it means “controlled the game”. One thing I’d say is that – at club level too – there’s this expectation among fans for 90-minute performances that in reality only come around every so often. Most teams nowadays are good, brilliantly drilled, and will have their moments in a game. You would expect Croatia, Mexico, Norway and even DR Congo all to cause a few problems. You’d expect Ghana to spoil given Carlos Queiroz was in charge. So I’m not overly surprised these games were quite patchy. Spain or Argentina will win the World Cup and I’m not sure either will look back and say that, in terms of control, they really put it together over a consistent run of matches – although Spain’s masterclass against France was an exception. They’ve simply been better in the moments that mattered.Ultimately it stops with him. I can’t really look much further on this one. Maybe Messi’s cross shouldn’t be met by 5ft 9in Martinez with Stones jumping in front… maybe Bellingham should see the danger more quickly and be out to block Fernandez. But players are not going to get everything 100% right if you’re asked to park the bus for 40 minutes, especially not against a team with such cunning and craft. And ask yourself this – apart from Dan Burn maybe, how many of these England players are really used to manning a rearguard action at domestic level? It was one thing doing this with 10 men against a Mexico team whose one idea was to cross the ball badly. Quite another here. And even if shoring up the back line, why not retain some ball-carrying threat from wide, which would also have the effect of giving Argentina’s attacking full-backs something to think about? We could go on forever.I think Tuchel should stay, there is little point rolling the dice again when little broader vision is evident in any case. It’s not quite enough of a flop to cut ties now. But make no mistake – he was brought in to win things, nothing less, so if England do not win Euro 2028 then his appointment has been a failure. Continue reading...
