Match statistics snapshot
- Antwerp created the clearer chances on xG (1.65 vs 0.92, Δ 0.73).
- Antwerp fired more attempts (27 vs 9 shots).
- Dender was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 1.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 673Lead | Accurate passes | 201 |
| 752Lead | Total passes | 275 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.57 | Goals prevented | 0.57 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.