Match statistics snapshot
- Avispa Fukuoka created the clearer chances on xG (0.94 vs 0.46, Δ 0.48).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 22%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.46 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 277 | Accurate passes | 572Lead |
| 374 | Total passes | 678Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |