Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (2.32 vs 2.47, Δ 0.15).
- Malmo FF fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- BK Hacken was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 2.32 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.47Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 576Lead |
| 278 | Total passes | 626Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |