Match statistics snapshot
- Cerezo Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 1.32, Δ 0.57).
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 308 | Accurate passes | 313Lead |
| 403 | Total passes | 414Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cerezo Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.