Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 0.92, Δ 1.24).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (27 vs 5 shots).
- Aston Villa was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 543Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 600Lead | Total passes | 285 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.