Match statistics snapshot
- Cerezo Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 2.03, Δ 1.05).
- Cerezo Osaka fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.03Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 9 |
| 9 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 313 | Accurate passes | 328Lead |
| 412Lead | Total passes | 411 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.