Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo created the clearer chances on xG (0.54 vs 1.90, Δ 1.36).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.54 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.90Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 611Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 694Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.