Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Gamba Osaka was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 9%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 5 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 501Lead | Accurate passes | 328 |
| 620Lead | Total passes | 436 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.