Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Gamba Osaka was more accurate in front of goal (86% on target vs 29%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 547Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.