Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo created the clearer chances on xG (3.53 vs 0.45, Δ 3.08).
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (24 vs 6 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 3.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 331Lead | Accurate passes | 322 |
| 420 | Total passes | 432Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.