Match statistics snapshot
- Kashima created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 1.93, Δ 1.13).
- Kashima fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Kashima was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.93Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 524Lead | Accurate passes | 358 |
| 626Lead | Total passes | 463 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.