Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 1.52, Δ 0.33).
- Kawasaki Frontale fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 220 | Accurate passes | 392Lead |
| 310 | Total passes | 486Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |