Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 0.91, Δ 0.21).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 477Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 583Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.