Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (15 vs 4 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 57% |
| 510Lead | Accurate passes | 136 |
| 613Lead | Total passes | 240 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.