Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 1.80, Δ 0.92).
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 535Lead | Accurate passes | 311 |
| 633Lead | Total passes | 418 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.