Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Oita Trinita was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 24%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 588Lead | Accurate passes | 288 |
| 666Lead | Total passes | 381 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |