Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (19 vs 7 shots).
- Oita Trinita was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 26%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| Offsides | ||
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 499Lead | Accurate passes | 314 |
| 594Lead | Total passes | 417 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |