Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 1.55, Δ 0.60).
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sagan Tosu |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.55 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sagan Tosu |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 317 |
| 520Lead | Total passes | 416 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sagan Tosu |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sagan Tosu |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sagan Tosu |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.