Match statistics snapshot
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima created the clearer chances on xG (0.66 vs 2.16, Δ 1.50).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima fired more attempts (22 vs 5 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 0.66 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.16Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 377Lead | Accurate passes | 355 |
| 504Lead | Total passes | 482 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.