Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Vissel Kobe held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6 | Shots off target | 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 319 | Accurate passes | 421Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 509Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |