Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| Offsides | ||
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 487Lead | Accurate passes | 432 |
| 555Lead | Total passes | 509 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |