Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 3 |
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 338 | Accurate passes | 344Lead |
| 441 | Total passes | 452Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.