Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 6%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 521Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 621Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |